Jan 28, 2008,Christian J Ferraro , Florida
We should be able to manage our accounts in the same manner as any other IRA type account. Our transfers should not be limited and the transfer should be as fast trading in and out of mutual funds in a regular stock IRA account.
Jan 28, 2008,Paul Cummins , Oklahoma
I have stopped contributing the max amount to my TSP. In investing, flexibility is paramount. Sorry (oh wise and ominscient Thrift Savings board) for the inconvonience of wanting some control over MY money.
Jan 26, 2008,M. Kirkpatrick , Virginia
A limit of two trades per month is entirely inappropriate.
Jan 26, 2008,Erik Pegg , California
We are already limited to a very few funds to chose from, please do not increase the restrictions on an already limited retirement plan!
Jan 26, 2008,Troy Mueller , Virginia
I believe it is completely unsatifactory for the Board to make this change without any notification or input from Federal employees. We should be alllowed to make changes at any time. I would certainly pay a fee if needed to cover costs beyond a certain number of trades a month, similar to other 401Ks with private industry.
Jan 25, 2008,Colin Kirk , Maryland
It's MY money, right? So why can't I control how it's spread out over the funds? If a fund is going downhill, I should be able to take action & cut my losses. I AM in favor of a small transaction fee to keep unlimited transactions in place. The Board is making the absolute WRONG decision in limiting our transactions.
Jan 25, 2008,Anonymous , Georgia
We need the freedom to manage our retirement accounts as WE see fit. The board has made the wrong decision on limiting the transfer of OUR funds to two per month.
Jan 24, 2008,Zahida Samad , Texas
With the recent upheaval on wall street one stands to loose a lot with restriction of only two interfund transfer per month. When the old civil retirement system was changed to the FERS in 1984 with contribution to social security the FERS pension[one of the 3 tiers] was not as generous as the old one. However one of the rationale or consolation was the tsp with its matching contributions and option of being in the stock market with possible unlimited gains for retirement nest egg. If the daily one interfund transfer is so burdensome to management and financially less beneficial to less active rest of tsp participants why did they allow it in 2004 and what was the thinking behind it that has changed now.
Jan 24, 2008,MARK HARRINGTON , Virginia
Limiting the number of trades is one thing; but locking us out of opportunities to reinvest shares in a climbing market is WRONG!! This is our retirement funds and such action should be legally challenged in court. Reverse the policy!!
Jan 24, 2008,Paul Dean , Florida
The TSP was designed to serve, not limit retirement options for participants: take off the handcuffs please!
Jan 24, 2008,Anonymous , Maryland
The TSP just mailed over 150,000 people the 3rd quarter statement (2nd copy) instead of the 4th quarter statement so guess who will pay for this mistake. We need to make some real changes to the TSP Board!
Jan 24, 2008,Maureen MacWilliams , Indiana
Please don't limit our ability to achieve financial independence when we retire. I personally do not make that many changes, but if some people prefer to manage their money that way they should be allowed to do it. Thank you.
Jan 24, 2008,Richard Jones , Washington
PLEASE do not restrict the access to MY money!!! I am near retirement and cannot recover from a buy-and-hold restriction in a Bear market!!!
Jan 24, 2008,Kathryn Simons , Texas
I feel I should have the right to change my shares as often as I choose, so that I might take advantage of current market trends.
Jan 24, 2008,Michael Meier , Virginia
This is my retirement program and it was setup for me to invest for the future. Let me do that.